PDA

View Full Version : Presidential Recount



i_hate_republicans
12-02-2004, 09:44 PM
The Green and Liberaterian parties have filed for recounts in Ohio, Nevada, and New Mexico. http://votecobb.org/ Go Kerry! :)

Kitten
12-02-2004, 09:49 PM
Didn't Kerry concede?

i_hate_republicans
12-02-2004, 09:55 PM
Yes, he didn't file the recount though. He still could win although it is probably unlikely. The recount is important because it will open people's eyes to all of the voting irregularities that have been reported, and the charges of widespread fraud.

Linda
12-02-2004, 09:55 PM
demanding recount = poor loser

Kitten
12-02-2004, 09:57 PM
Ah, ok, I was just wondering seeing as how he had conceded I didn't think that he would ask for a recount.

i_hate_republicans
12-02-2004, 10:08 PM
As Jesse Jackson stated: "We can deal with winning and losing. We cannot live with fraud and stealing." I agree with him, although I would hate to lost to W, if he in fact won honestly.

Revolver-2005?
12-03-2004, 01:50 PM
demanding recount = poor loser

dont u mean sore loser? And neway Bush sucks, i was hoping Kerry would win

Floyd the Barber
12-03-2004, 02:17 PM
The Green and Liberaterian parties have filed for recounts in Ohio, Nevada, and New Mexico. http://votecobb.org/ Go Kerry! :)

Wow, what an original concept for a username. You remind me of the obnoxious, self-righteous liberal teenage faggots who've overrun my high school. So tell me, was it CNN or Michael Moore who succeeded in brainwashing you?

Get a life. Bush won by almost 4 million votes. Kerry lost. Get over it.

Moose
12-03-2004, 02:32 PM
you act like the democrats dont cheat as well...this is why i hate when fucking people choose parties because they become blind to what their party does wrong...just look at things issue by issue and decide for yourself what is right and wrong. besides you act like this recount matters, he lost because he fucked up his entire campaign not because he didnt cheat better than bush.

Vera
12-03-2004, 02:58 PM
It's like "Hey, he's a pig, but he's our pig!"

I don't know.

wheelchairman
12-03-2004, 03:47 PM
I have a hard time understanding why the libertarians and the republicans can't work together in many things. Economically they want the same thing, and they both want smaller government.

Libertarians just suck so much.

Floyd the Barber, we all know you're an idiot, so I wouldn't go around calling names.

Revolver-2005?
12-03-2004, 03:59 PM
whts so bad about being liberal...liberal only means giving and willing to change...why be conservative? i mean i cant stand just keeping everything and never changing...the world needs change

Not Ozymandias
12-03-2004, 04:16 PM
I don't care. Bush won by 3 million votes. Let him have it.

Not Ozymandias
12-03-2004, 04:24 PM
Then again...

http://www.bostonphoenix.com/boston/news_features/other_stories/multi-page/documents/04256171.asp

Not Ozymandias
12-03-2004, 04:26 PM
I have a hard time understanding why the libertarians and the republicans can't work together in many things. Economically they want the same thing, and they both want smaller government.

Libertarians just suck so much.
Republicans don't want smaller goverment, they just want to be first in line at the trough.

Libertarians are pretty sad.

i_hate_republicans
12-03-2004, 04:45 PM
[QUOTE=Floyd the Barber] So tell me, was it CNN or Michael Moore who succeeded in brainwashing you?

So tell me, how many hours a day do you watch Fox News? And how many hours of Rush Limbaugh do you listen to on the radio every day?

Regarding CNN, if it has a "liberal bias," why hasn't there been any coverage of the recounts? If they are so biased, shouldn't they be screaming for a recount in Ohio?

Moose
12-03-2004, 04:46 PM
why are libertarians sad? they are very pro rights and not about political correctness...maybe im wrong someone enlighten me on the subject of why you say libertarians are sad and such...

offsprung
12-03-2004, 04:58 PM
didn't they say kerry cheated with votes in PA? just a rumor perhaps..

Floyd the Barber
12-03-2004, 05:35 PM
Floyd the Barber, we all know you're an idiot, so I wouldn't go around calling names.

"We all" know, huh? Seems only you and one of Trip Boy's impersonators have a problem with me.

And I don't believe I've called anyone on here a name, either.

Don't be so touchy.

Floyd the Barber
12-03-2004, 05:38 PM
[QUOTE=Floyd the Barber] So tell me, was it CNN or Michael Moore who succeeded in brainwashing you?

So tell me, how many hours a day do you watch Fox News? And how many hours of Rush Limbaugh do you listen to on the radio every day?

Regarding CNN, if it has a "liberal bias," why hasn't there been any coverage of the recounts? If they are so biased, shouldn't they be screaming for a recount in Ohio?

I barely ever watch Fox News (or ANY news, for that matter) and I never listen to Rush. I just think your username's kind of retarded.

No, CNN shouldn't be "screaming for a recount" cause the whole think is fucking pointless. Even the Democrats say there's no way the outcome's gonna change.

Not Ozymandias
12-03-2004, 05:53 PM
didn't they say kerry cheated with votes in PA? just a rumor perhaps..
There were net rumors on Election Day that voting machines in PA had been delivered with hundreds of votes for Bush already logged. It turned out to be started by closeted homosexual/right-wing nutbag Matt Drudge and not even Kerry's people took it seriously.

Unless you meant something else. :o

Not Ozymandias
12-03-2004, 05:56 PM
why are libertarians sad? they are very pro rights and not about political correctness...maybe im wrong someone enlighten me on the subject of why you say libertarians are sad and such...
Because their whole philosophy is warped and would result in us being crushed by corporations. Even more than currently. Libertarianism is running neck-and-neck with Anarchy and Communism in the naivete sweepstakes.

Political correctness is a ghost from the 90s that means nothing nowadays.

Linda
12-03-2004, 07:26 PM
dont u mean sore loser? And neway Bush sucks, i was hoping Kerry would win

sore...poor....works both ways.
both of them suck!

Revolver-2005?
12-03-2004, 07:55 PM
and being conservative means u wht? do the same thing all the time...being liberal isnt being communist, if it were communist we would rule everything and no one would have a say, being liberal is all about having rights....and saying its on the verge of being communist and anarchist? tht contradicts itself anarchy is wanting no government while communism is a form of gov

and also no polls were rigged in PA, i live here nothin happened

Moose
12-03-2004, 08:12 PM
well thats what it means, but some believe thats not what it represents...like communism its supposed to represent a fair economic system, but the largest communist countries have been run by dictators and such...a lot of liberals are considered to be socialists...some are actually, but its basically been labeled that...and conservatives have been labeled as angry old men who are racists and sexists want to kill...both are ridiculous in a way...i still would like some more info on why libertarians suck so much...

wheelchairman
12-04-2004, 04:42 AM
Libertarians suck because they believe in complete liberal economic policies (and by liberal economic policies, I am using the economic definition that the world uses.) They want the state to interfere as little as possible with the economy. Everything should be run on a completely fair market.

They also wanted to abolish the Federal Reserve as I recall.

They are the supreme protector of private property rights as well. The only job of the government is to do everything at just a bare minimum.

They believe in a complete abolishment of any form of welfare, and most forms of state spending in general. Because it interferes with their fragile free market.