PDA

View Full Version : Communism, Anarhism



Correy46
05-23-2007, 10:44 AM
What your opinions ????What do u think about reds???I would like to know:D

wheelchairman
05-23-2007, 10:59 AM
Scum, the political tools of the satanic left!

Correy46
05-23-2007, 11:02 AM
Where are your arguements???))))

wheelchairman
05-23-2007, 11:08 AM
http://www.soviet-empire.com/images/propaganda/mp3_communism.jpg

happy?

Mota Boy
05-23-2007, 12:33 PM
They are both theories that sound questionable on paper, but when played out in real life end up being complete disasters. The main difference between the two groups is that anarchists are, on the whole, more delusional than communists.

Jojan
05-23-2007, 12:33 PM
Communism works fine. Anarchism as well.
The problem is that the communists in the world has become too greedy.

Biggest offspring fan
05-23-2007, 03:16 PM
Anarchy!!!

JohnnyNemesis
05-23-2007, 04:41 PM
Anyone remember The Offspring's Guide to Web Anarchy?

Markus
05-23-2007, 10:00 PM
what's wrong with peace on earth?

Sin Studly
05-23-2007, 10:19 PM
If Russia becomes Anarchist will they change the name of St. Petersburg again? What's a good anarchist name for it? Fuckthechurchgrad? Fuckthepolicegrad? NOAMRgrad?

edit ; I punkburg?

Markus
05-23-2007, 10:41 PM
In this world you will have trouble. But take heart! I have over come the world.
John 16:33 (words from Christ)

Correy46
05-23-2007, 11:07 PM
If Russia becomes Anarchist will they change the name of St. Petersburg again? What's a good anarchist name for it? Fuckthechurchgrad? Fuckthepolicegrad? NOAMRgrad?

edit ; I punkburg?

Are u fuckin idiot???

And so, guys, I haven't heard any opinions & arguemants ....

JohnnyNemesis
05-24-2007, 12:04 AM
And so, guys, I haven't heard any opinions & arguemants ....

That's cause no one takes you seriously you fucking faggot.

All About Eve
05-24-2007, 12:23 AM
And so, guys, I haven't heard any opinions & arguemants ....
ur an opinon & argument!

the_GoDdEsS
05-24-2007, 12:31 AM
My personal favourite is NOAMRgrad. Lolz to that.

Correy46
05-24-2007, 02:07 AM
That's cause no one takes you seriously you fucking faggot.

Fuck off plz, if u have nothing to say don't do it...

Sin Studly
05-24-2007, 02:58 AM
Tvoya mamushka ye kurva.

One Hundred Punx
05-24-2007, 08:16 AM
Tvoya mamushka ye kurva.
Learn English!!

Whiplash
05-24-2007, 08:20 AM
fuck you, He wasn't talking to you now was he?

the_GoDdEsS
05-24-2007, 08:26 AM
Learn English!!

You can do one good deed today ; stop posting.

Sin Studly
05-24-2007, 08:38 AM
Learn English!!

Your mother's a whore, how's that for English?

wheelchairman
05-24-2007, 08:56 AM
http://www.authentichistory.com/1960s/treasure_chest/cover_01.jpg (http://www.authentichistory.com/1960s/treasure_chest/cover_01.html)

Here's your arguments and reasons right here! Punk!

Llamas
05-24-2007, 09:23 AM
And so, guys, I haven't heard any opinions & arguemants ....

Anarchy is the absence of political authority. Anarchy as a “political movement” is a contradiction of terms in my opinion. Regardless, the lack of a governing body would inevitably result in large groups of people, gangs if you will, violating individual rights. The government’s role should be limited to protecting individual rights, but the lack of a governing body protecting the rights of individuals would result in mobs of people taking justice into their own hands. Democracy along with the concept of individual rights is, so far, one of the better political systems. Though it still sucks in a lot of ways.

wheelchairman
05-24-2007, 09:33 AM
Anarchy is the absence of political authority. Anarchy as a “political movement” is a contradiction of terms in my opinion. Regardless, the lack of a governing body would inevitably result in large groups of people, gangs if you will, violating individual rights. The government’s role should be limited to protecting individual rights, but the lack of a governing body protecting the rights of individuals would result in mobs of people taking justice into their own hands. Democracy along with the concept of individual rights is, so far, one of the better political systems. Though it still sucks in a lot of ways.

Anarchism has governments in the form of syndicates. At least some forms do. It's really retarded though. Like mob rule is the only form of justice in their eyes. Ridiculous.

F@ BANKZ
05-24-2007, 10:35 AM
Neither works, out of the two i'm with communism, at least it works in theory.

Sin Studly
05-24-2007, 11:28 AM
I just can't get over the fact that there's a political system that doesn't even work in theory. At least democracy and communism look nice on paper.

the Alternate
05-24-2007, 11:50 AM
Back to topic. Communism is impossible because you'll never can make the people be ideal. As far as I remember the communism needs another combination of "perfect man".
There wasn't communism in any part of the world and never will be. Anarchy is possible but it will always end as a dictate. It is the same from the times of ancient Rome and before.

Sin Studly
05-24-2007, 11:55 AM
Ass-primitive tribals functioned under a form of communism.

wheelchairman
05-24-2007, 01:49 PM
Back to topic. Communism is impossible because you'll never can make the people be ideal. As far as I remember the communism needs another combination of "perfect man".
There wasn't communism in any part of the world and never will be. Anarchy is possible but it will always end as a dictate. It is the same from the times of ancient Rome and before.
Communism doesn't want people to be an ideal, at least no more than any other system does. Enemy at the Gates is full of shit.

Mota Boy
05-24-2007, 02:33 PM
I just can't get over the fact that there's a political system that doesn't even work in theory. At least democracy and communism look nice on paper.
Communism doesn't even work on paper. It violates the most basic principle of economics - the law of supply and demand - by only focusing on the supply aspect. It works solely as an emotional appeal - "Come on guys, wouldn't life be great if there were no poor people? If we could all just do whatever jobs we wanted? Herd sheep in the morning and then fish in the afternoon? Wouldn't life be totally cool?"

wheelchairman
05-24-2007, 02:53 PM
That's not a fundamental law of economics. That's a fundamental law of market economics.

the Alternate
05-25-2007, 08:44 AM
Ok, let's check the statements. Do not mess the communism with socialism. the Soviet Union was a socialist country and it was never admitted that the communism was built. It was a long-term goal.
The slogan of communism is "From everyone on abilities, to everyone on needs". It was supposed that everyone does his best not dependent on what he receives. (it was supposed that he gets everything he needs). Even in this scheme it is obvious that it is impossible. You can't do anything absolutely perfect.
Also the system of planning. It works only in very simple structures. It isn't also flexible (a 5 year plans in USSR showed it). So it makes big contradictions and is very difficult to do all the time.
Communism means no money. In USSR there was money, it was a big problem in ideology so it was supposed to be temporary.
Believing in communism is the same as to believe in God ))) the only difference is in object.

F@ BANKZ
05-25-2007, 09:28 AM
I just can't get over the fact that there's a political system that doesn't even work in theory. At least democracy and communism look nice on paper.

The point of anarchy is that it isn't a political system at all. Basically the way I see it, between the two it is a matter of either: every man, woman and child for themselves which will ultimately lead to new groups anyway, or a fair slice of cake for all aswell as a functional govornment and legal system.

Sin Studly
05-25-2007, 09:50 AM
Believing in communism is the same as to believe in God ))) the only difference is in object.

The only other difference is that the Communists send you to GULAG for believing in God.

the Alternate
05-25-2007, 10:46 AM
The only other difference is that the Communists send you to GULAG for believing in God.

It is basically the inquisition.

Sin Studly
05-25-2007, 02:37 PM
So commies are only lagging three centuries behind the rest of the world?

H1T_That
05-26-2007, 08:18 AM
So commies are only lagging three centuries behind the rest of the world?

Only 3 centuries?

ZagmenO
05-26-2007, 08:45 AM
I support anarchism 100%!!!

That_Guy91
05-27-2007, 07:55 AM
That's the extent of an intellectual anarchist conversation.

HornyPope
06-08-2007, 11:57 AM
So commies are only lagging three centuries behind the rest of the world?

If you ever lived among them, they would beat you up every week.

SkunkIt
06-08-2007, 01:12 PM
AnArChY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Communichy!!!!!!!!!!!!! Anarcommunichism!!!!!!!!!

....Since when did the Skinheads like The Offspring? I thought they had better taste. D:

wheelchairman
06-08-2007, 03:14 PM
Have you seen your taste in chicks?

SkunkIt
06-08-2007, 03:44 PM
Yes, but my last comment was a joke. Besides, I was talking about musical taste.

Besides, you can't say she's not pretty:


http://files.playstatic.com/ps2/guitar-hero-2/guitar.jpg

wheelchairman
06-08-2007, 05:00 PM
No I can't. But the majority of your posts in the beautiful women's thread are uuuuuugllaaaay.

noodlesfan
06-09-2007, 03:08 AM
So, am I the only one who noticed that we're talking about 'anarhism' instead of 'anarchism'?

noodlesfan
06-09-2007, 03:11 AM
Has the OP actually read anything about leftist revolution, or is he just some idiot who just covered that section on revolution in school.

Sin Studly
06-09-2007, 08:43 AM
Here's (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LPLQegHA-lo) what I think of communists and anarhists.

noodlesfan
06-09-2007, 11:01 AM
Sin, I'm crying.

Come live with me in my commune. We grow phallic vegetables and dance with no clothes on.