PDA

View Full Version : Descendents vs All



Genocide17
02-08-2009, 03:17 PM
like you will probably know, all and descendents are almost the same band except for milo aukerman in descendents and dave smalley (87-88)/scott reynolds (89-92) /chad price (93-present) and i wonder what band is better, i think the two are equally good for me but i prefer a little bit more all, what do you think?

all or descendents?

dff_punk
02-08-2009, 03:27 PM
I actually enjoy All quite more, too. But music of both bands is not that unsimilar.

Alex101
02-08-2009, 03:31 PM
I like both bands actually, but I like ALL the best. I've been digging their 1995 Pummel album.

Outerspaceman21
02-08-2009, 03:31 PM
THE DESCENDENTS RULE OVER ALL!!!

http://www.mitchclem.com/nothingnice/398/

Funny comic

0r4ng3
02-08-2009, 04:03 PM
I prefer Descendents. I realize they sound the same, but I just find All to be slightly boring. I don't even know why. I couldn't come up with a specific reason I don't listen to All.

RODNEYMULLEN
02-11-2009, 07:31 PM
I like descendents better, because i only have like 1 all album and i have all descendents shit, plus cool to be you was a really good album.