PDA

View Full Version : Thought 14



Al Coholic
12-01-2009, 08:01 PM
Breasts are pretty awesome. But do you think they're naturally awsome, or do you think that it's purely instinctive? This actually pertains to everything we find sexually arousing. Do you think the shape of it plays a roll at all? Or are we just programed to like whatever the opposite(and sometimes same) sex has?

Lets say breasts and penises switched place. Men peed out of a one giant boob(let's say vaginas have a wider shape to accomodate) and women had two penises where their breasts are that produce milk. Sounds sick now, but chances are men would still go to a strip club to see a girl with big dicks dancing. But do you think it would be exactly the same? In this alternate world, would it be just as disgusting and gay to think of sucking on breasts, the way you'd think about sucking on dicks now?

Suppose breasts didn't have a humanistic shape. Let's say instead they were cubes. Would we be looking at internet porn of girls with the most perfect cubes? "Look at those cubes man, they're perfect 90 degree right angles!"



?

Jebus
12-01-2009, 08:21 PM
I always wondered how men in tribes that have bare breasted women walk around all day without a boner. Are breasts just as appealing to them as they are for us? Or have they been desensitized to breasts over time? Maybe it's simply the forbiddeness of it that makes us attracted to breasts and not the actual shape.

_Lost_
12-01-2009, 08:34 PM
I think its cultural. I've heard more than once that boob fixations, on a global scale, aren't common for most cultures and that we're weird in that respect.

Al Coholic
12-01-2009, 09:17 PM
If we could think outside the bra - just as far as what's sexually appealing. You think if all women were perfectly square, as though built out of cardboard boxes, we'd be as attracted?

_Lost_
12-01-2009, 09:34 PM
Perhaps if that was the status quo. All women have the same basic shape. I mean, boobs, waist, butt, no crotch protrusions, legs. Obviously there are factors that effect the overall shape from person to person, such as being fat, tall, short, etc. But we all start with the same basic shape. So I guess, were we to have a completely different shape than we do now, but we all had that shape, then you'd have no choice but to find us attractive since that is all you ever knew and otherwise the species would die out.

But we'd have to come up with new terms for describing a women's rack and man junk.

"She just had the biggest salamis I've ever seen! You're girlfriend's lil' smokeys are no comparison."

"It's like he put a basketball in his shorts! I couldn't believe how big and round he was."

Of course, this brings about a couple other thoughts on the matter:

Would the men still be the one's to get hard in this scenario?
What happens to male self esteem when its so blatantly obvious which men have the bigger boobdicks?
Would this lead to an increase in compesation in other areas?
How would one make athletic cups differently to incorporate these changes?
Would the shape of ya'lls nuts be different than it is now?

Al Coholic
12-01-2009, 09:45 PM
Would the men still be the one's to get hard in this scenario?
*The boob would get a little harder, but the woman's vag would be so gaping to accomodate you could essentially just plop them in there and ejaculate via the nipple.

What happens to male self esteem when its so blatantly obvious which men have the bigger boobdicks?
Would this lead to an increase in compesation in other areas?
*Self esteem would go way down in some guys, but technology for push-up briefs would be centuries ahead of today. Since breast augmentation is so easy to do, half of the men in the world would get fakes anyway

How would one make athletic cups differently to incorporate these changes?
They'd be bigger?

Would the shape of ya'lls nuts be different than it is now?
No, but they'd glow in the dark for some reason.

T-6005
12-01-2009, 09:46 PM
I think the men would really be getting the short end of the stick on that switch, since we'd be giving up one dick and women would be getting two, thus opening them up to (quite literally) double blowjobs.

Unfair.

Al Coholic
12-01-2009, 09:49 PM
Yeah but glow in the dark balls man.

T-6005
12-01-2009, 10:27 PM
2 blowjobs for the price of one.

Al Coholic
12-01-2009, 11:00 PM
Technically for men they'd be called a sucklejob.

T-6005
12-01-2009, 11:32 PM
Technically for men they'd be called a sucklejob.
Hah. I quite literally just meant that the potential for 2 dicks is much higher than the potential for one.

That's not to say that the realistic results would be better - because seriously, who's got the skills or the patience? Still, the potential's there.

I predict women with 2 boob penises would be much more into threesomes than women now.

Al Coholic
12-01-2009, 11:40 PM
Technically though, the chestpenii wouldn't serve any reproductive purpose(like boobs). Vaginas as we know them would be so wide to accomodate the male genitalboob that a chestpenis being inserted wouldn't really do much. It'd be like sticking your dick in a wet backpack.

I tell you though, sex would look gay as hell. Image when she gets aroused and while you're going at it missionary style, you have two hard dicks slapping around your face and chest. That would be quite a nuissance.

Also, you could tell that anyone who still had a gag reflex wasn't breastfed.

T-6005
12-01-2009, 11:55 PM
I think my question was mostly - will chest-dicks feel as good as regular old dicks?

Because seriously, if you don't see the potential for threesomes after that I don't know what we're to do with you.

Al Coholic
12-02-2009, 12:08 AM
No, because vaginas are now made as recipticles for boob-sized dicks.

But I suppose you could have an anal 3 way with two women riding the chest of another woman. And hell, that leaves four unnattended chestdicks. So yeah, the potential is infinate.

Llamas
12-02-2009, 03:11 AM
I think its cultural. I've heard more than once that boob fixations, on a global scale, aren't common for most cultures and that we're weird in that respect.
From what I understand, this is pretty true. I've always wondered why we're so obsessed with boobs... I heard (on the british The Office... not sure about accuracy :D) that it's from the cavemen days - men did women from behind, and so a woman's ass turned them on a lot... eventually, breasts reminded them of a behind, and they got turned on about that. I guess over time it just evolved and spread... I'm not sure why gay women like 'em though ;)


"She just had the biggest salamis I've ever seen! You're girlfriend's lil' smokeys are no comparison."

"It's like he put a basketball in his shorts! I couldn't believe how big and round he was."

Of course, this brings about a couple other thoughts on the matter:

Would the men still be the one's to get hard in this scenario?
What happens to male self esteem when its so blatantly obvious which men have the bigger boobdicks?
Would this lead to an increase in compesation in other areas?
How would one make athletic cups differently to incorporate these changes?
Would the shape of ya'lls nuts be different than it is now?

This is excellent. The nuts would look so funny underneath the boobdick...


Would the men still be the one's to get hard in this scenario?
*The boob would get a little harder, but the woman's vag would be so gaping to accomodate you could essentially just plop them in there and ejaculate via the nipple.
Damn... a gaping vag? So there'd have to be like just this huge hole all the time? That would be really uncomfortable. I feel like it'd be really hard to clean... and wiping after using the toilet would be super weird. and well, what about oral sex? Seems like it'd be way too much work with a gaping vag. I'm pretty happy with my small vag and non-dangling boobs, thankyou.

Oh, and I've never heard a woman talk about how great some guy's dick looks, like how guys talk about women's boobs. I've always gotten the impression that women only care about a dick's size for sex, and maybe less hair surrounding? But boobs... well do big or small boobs really make a difference in sex? No... it's just some weird thing where bigger is better for some psychological reason.

RageAndLov
12-02-2009, 05:11 AM
I think both men and women (at least most of them) like boobs better than penises. Boobs are much prettier to look at and much more delicious to touch than those hard, weird-looking sticks.

The facts that boobs are a symbol of a woman's capability to produce healthy children and boobs being nice-looking and delicious to touch are what makes men liking boobs so much.

jacknife737
12-02-2009, 10:06 AM
I got a bunch of stares at the library, since i've been lulzing at the mental images from this thread for the past couple minutes.

I'm assuming that the dick-chested girls would need like reinforced bras to accommodate for hard-ons? Because that could look really awkward at work.

JohnnyNemesis
12-02-2009, 10:11 AM
Love that Tomb Raider 1 tag.


Or have they been desensitized to breasts over time? Maybe it's simply the forbiddeness of it that makes us attracted to breasts and not the actual shape.

I think this is what the deal is. It's this, plus context.

Think about when you've been in a relationship for a long time. At the beginning of the relationship, seeing your girlfriend roll up a sleeve or expose her neck is likely enough to give you a boner because everything is new and exciting at that point. About a year later , you're still with the girl, and even if you find her as sexy as you always did, you're not exactly walking around with a hard-on when she's walking around the apartment naked or sleeping in her underwear. Until things get sexual. And then you're like "omg lol let's sex it up" and you're insatiable, etc. Context. Etc.

Llamas
12-02-2009, 10:18 AM
I'm assuming that the dick-chested girls would need like reinforced bras to accommodate for hard-ons? Because that could look really awkward at work.

It might reverse the "bigger is better" idea... I think I'd prefer a chick with smaller dickboobs...

Superdope
12-02-2009, 11:05 AM
Looks like it's that time of month for someones giant vag.

Iron deficiency much?

EDIT: awww :( no fun when it gets deleted. (This wasn't aimed at you, Bri)

Al Coholic
12-03-2009, 11:18 PM
You guys think women would get their chestdicks circumsized more or less often? or at all?

Personally I think strippers might have problems with all that foreskin flappin around. But then again, some of them might be able to tie them in a knot so...

Lizardus
12-04-2009, 12:57 AM
Yeah but glow in the dark balls man.

Chernobyl, here we go!

T-6005
12-04-2009, 12:05 PM
Chernobyl, here we go!

Don't you mean Chernobyl here we come?

Al Coholic
06-14-2010, 02:08 AM
I can't believe it just occured to me, but tampons would have to be the size of pringles cans.

mrconeman
06-14-2010, 01:23 PM
Nobody has touched on the fact that it's all psychological?

We're programmed to find boobs attractive the bigger/healthier they are because they pertain to the woman being a more suitable partner in achieving the single thing we're actually programmed to do, pass on our genes.

In other words, big boobs = milk = healthy babies. It's as simple as that.

For Real
06-14-2010, 09:25 PM
eeeww, this thread is like a car wreck - just as hard to watch as it is NOT to...


From what I understand, this is pretty true. I've always wondered why we're so obsessed with boobs... I heard (on the british The Office... not sure about accuracy that it's from the cavemen days - men did women from behind

Probably because their first knowledge of sex was from watching the animals? ewww.


I'm pretty happy with my small vag and non-dangling boobs, thankyou.

more like SMALL case of vaginitis, and NON-boobs. LOL! :p

(sowwy! but was wonderin' where that quote originated from and just HAD to make a joke!)


Oh, and I've never heard a woman talk about how great some guy's dick looks, like how guys talk about women's boobs.

haha! so true. :D

T-6005
06-14-2010, 09:28 PM
Nobody has touched on the fact that it's all psychological?

We're programmed to find boobs attractive the bigger/healthier they are because they pertain to the woman being a more suitable partner in achieving the single thing we're actually programmed to do, pass on our genes.

In other words, big boobs = milk = healthy babies. It's as simple as that.

Of course we haven't. That wouldn't be nearly as much fun.

Personally, I'd be into really weird boobdick porn with a cerebral theme.

two_rubiks_theme_dicks_fight_to_fit_first.avi

For Real
06-14-2010, 09:39 PM
Personally, I'd be into really weird boobdick porn with a cerebral theme.

two_rubiks_theme_dicks_fight_to_fit_first.avi

Um, I know a chick who could probably help you with that, she is in the porn biz. Wasn't sure if you were wanting an actual person, or just the porn. I would post her twitter page but am having problems accessing twitter today. Really weird.

(I seriously need to stay away from these thread types...:rolleyes:)

T-6005
06-14-2010, 10:16 PM
No boobdick no orgasm (no cry).