
Originally Posted by
jacknife737
those parents are dumb and are likely setting that kid up for a fair amount of unnecessary hurdles with a name like that.
Oh of course, I'm sure pretty much everyone agrees that the kid is better off without that name. I just can't see any way that the judge had the right to do it and I was wondering if anyone else could make an actual case for it.
“Today a young man on acid realized that all matter is merely energy condensed to a slow vibration, that we are all one consciousness experiencing itself subjectively, there is no such thing as death, life is only a dream, and we are the imagination of ourselves.” – Bill Hicks