I don't see the problem. As a fans we can take a pictures for facebook or instagram, but it's nothing weird that they won't have shitty photos at magazines or official websites. If somebody is a professional photographer, he should could makes good pictures. If he can't- his pictures shouldn't be publicated. And it's nothing wrong that band want verify that work.
Yeah, like we all haven't had the pleasure of being told about that a zillion times.
There are only two tragedies in life: one is not getting what one wants, and the other is getting it. Oscar Wilde
Oh well what are you gonna do... I love how for some reason that is a bad thing.. look at eary's comment. It comes off as if that is something I constantly brag about. Fact of the matter is most of the time I use it to help out other fans, but that doesn't really matter to anyone I guess. I guess I should deny it or lie about it or something, I don't know...
I like it how ass-kissers try to make this thing about "photographic quality control"...they don't allow VIDEO close-ups - because of the age factor. And that is what fans consider silly. Grow a pair some of you.
A ghost is all that's left, of everything we swore we never would forget. Tried to bleed the sickness, but we drained our hearts instead. We are...we are the dead.
But maybe they let me do it, because I am the king of the universe and super intelligent (and modest...)
OR... maybe just maybe they want professionally published material to look *gasp* like it was done by professionals. OH THE HUMANITY!!!!
Gosh oh golly now I feel like an ass kisser for actually having a triple digit IQ and being able to comprehend such a complicated fucking concept.